|
|
@@ -1,36 +1,37 @@
|
|
|
-//Any ideas or suggestions you guys have, put them here.
|
|
|
-//These don't have to be put into the source, but maybe if
|
|
|
-//you would like something down... someone might do it? lol
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-----
|
|
|
-I (Ajarn) have loads of ideas. I might as well put them here. If no one does them it's fine, because I plan
|
|
|
-on doing them eventually if no one else does.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-1) Better jail system. You know how the ban system has a time column, so you can set a certain amount of
|
|
|
-ban time? I think jailing should have this to. This way you can unjail the character when they are online
|
|
|
-or not, and jail them if they are on or not, etc. This will also lock their char to the jail until the
|
|
|
-state of that column is changed. One the time hits that they can come out (every min run a timer maybe?)
|
|
|
-they are unjailed if online, and if they are offline, the next time they log on it will check that column
|
|
|
-and unjail them then.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-2) Addition to ban system. Ban works on a state system and I think ti should have another state. Instead of
|
|
|
-fully banning someone you should have the option of banning them from creating new chars before a full ban.
|
|
|
-This way you can jail their chars, and ban creation of new chars. Then they have to sit in the jail and
|
|
|
-talk it out with a GM. Gets problems solved easier.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-3) Better gm level system. Basicly a gm command has group numbers after it (monster:1,5,99) and those gm
|
|
|
-levels can use it. This way you can have a much more flexible system. But when I think about it... it takes
|
|
|
-a lot of checking to do it that way, and in the long run, it would be a lot more flexible and easier to
|
|
|
-have account names after each gm command. I'm not sure which one I like, or which one should be used, but
|
|
|
-the "level" system is kind of hard to do when you want to have sistem levels. Like, some have group A
|
|
|
-commands, and some have group B commands, having nothing to do with group A. There is no way to do that
|
|
|
-with the current system.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-4) Private Message SPY! (@pmspy <char name>) What it does is you see everything that that person private
|
|
|
-messages to another, and anything another pms to them. I'm not sure if it can be already done, but this
|
|
|
-would stack with @guildspy and @partyspy. So, you you know thier party, and guild and you do all three
|
|
|
-spies, and you follow them around you can hear everything they are saying.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-5) Probably a stupid idea, but @localspy. It basicly spies on all the text that they can hear localy and
|
|
|
-sends it to you like "ajarn can hear: ....." and "ajarn says: ..." This way you can do #4 to a person, and
|
|
|
-then this, without following them, and get the same effect.
|
|
|
+//Any ideas or suggestions you guys have, put them here.
|
|
|
+//These don't have to be put into the source, but maybe if
|
|
|
+//you would like something down... someone might do it? lol
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+I (Ajarn) have loads of ideas. I might as well put them here. If no one does them it's fine, because I plan
|
|
|
+on doing them eventually if no one else does.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1) Better jail system. You know how the ban system has a time column, so you can set a certain amount of
|
|
|
+ban time? I think jailing should have this to. This way you can unjail the character when they are online
|
|
|
+or not, and jail them if they are on or not, etc. This will also lock their char to the jail until the
|
|
|
+state of that column is changed. One the time hits that they can come out (every min run a timer maybe?)
|
|
|
+they are unjailed if online, and if they are offline, the next time they log on it will check that column
|
|
|
+and unjail them then.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+2) Addition to ban system. Ban works on a state system and I think ti should have another state. Instead of
|
|
|
+fully banning someone you should have the option of banning them from creating new chars before a full ban.
|
|
|
+This way you can jail their chars, and ban creation of new chars. Then they have to sit in the jail and
|
|
|
+talk it out with a GM. Gets problems solved easier.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+3) Better gm level system. Basicly a gm command has group numbers after it (monster:1,5,99) and those gm
|
|
|
+levels can use it. This way you can have a much more flexible system. But when I think about it... it takes
|
|
|
+a lot of checking to do it that way, and in the long run, it would be a lot more flexible and easier to
|
|
|
+have account names after each gm command. I'm not sure which one I like, or which one should be used, but
|
|
|
+the "level" system is kind of hard to do when you want to have sistem levels. Like, some have group A
|
|
|
+commands, and some have group B commands, having nothing to do with group A. There is no way to do that
|
|
|
+with the current system.
|
|
|
+ nsstrunks: The group numbers is kinda pointless, since currently if you set it to a higher number, everyone above that will have access.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+4) Private Message SPY! (@pmspy <char name>) What it does is you see everything that that person private
|
|
|
+messages to another, and anything another pms to them. I'm not sure if it can be already done, but this
|
|
|
+would stack with @guildspy and @partyspy. So, you you know thier party, and guild and you do all three
|
|
|
+spies, and you follow them around you can hear everything they are saying.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+5) Probably a stupid idea, but @localspy. It basicly spies on all the text that they can hear localy and
|
|
|
+sends it to you like "ajarn can hear: ....." and "ajarn says: ..." This way you can do #4 to a person, and
|
|
|
+then this, without following them, and get the same effect.
|
nsstrunks